| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Acre. |
|
Data corrente: |
10/06/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
28/06/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
MATUK, F. A.; TURNHOUT, E.; FLESKENS, L.; AMARAL, E. F. do; HAVERROTH, M.; BEHAGEL, J. H. |
|
Afiliação: |
Fernanda Ayaviri Matuk, Wageningen University; Esther Turnhout, Wageningen University; Luuk Fleskens, Wageningen University; EUFRAN FERREIRA DO AMARAL, CPAF-AC; MOACIR HAVERROTH, CPAF-AC; Jelle Hendrik Behagel, Wageningen University. |
|
Título: |
Allying knowledge integration and co-production for knowledge legitimacy and usability: The Amazonian SISA policy and the Kaxinawá Indigenous people case. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Environmental Science and Policy, v. 112, p. 1-9, 2020. |
|
ISSN: |
1462-9011 |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.04.018 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Environmental policies that aim to enhance nature conservation, biodiversity, and well-being of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLC) rely on knowledge integration and co-production processes that include both science and Indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) systems. While these processes are expected to safeguard the diversity of knowledge systems, uneven power relations among participants often prevent them from achieving this which can affect the legitimacy and usability of the outcomes of these processes. Using a case study in the Acre state (Brazil), where policy practitioners implemented the REDD+policy System of Incentives for Ecosystem Services in the Brazilian Kaxinawá Nova Olinda Indigenous Land, we investigate how participants manage challenges to safeguard knowledge diversity and usability during policy assessment and planning. Our findings show how, despite the use of participatory approaches, knowledge diversity ended up being compromised because policy practitioners were insufficiently attentive to power asymmetries and their implications. This, however, did not negatively affect the usability of the knowledge outcomes. Rather than focusing on the perfection of participatory methods, we call for a practical ethics that relies on culturally and ethically sensitive dialogues and that include continuous reflection. Such reflection will enable adaptation and improvisation to be able to respond to emerging power dynamics in an adequate and timely manner, thereby ensuring both the legitimacy and the usability of the outcomes of knowledge integration and co-production. MenosEnvironmental policies that aim to enhance nature conservation, biodiversity, and well-being of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLC) rely on knowledge integration and co-production processes that include both science and Indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) systems. While these processes are expected to safeguard the diversity of knowledge systems, uneven power relations among participants often prevent them from achieving this which can affect the legitimacy and usability of the outcomes of these processes. Using a case study in the Acre state (Brazil), where policy practitioners implemented the REDD+policy System of Incentives for Ecosystem Services in the Brazilian Kaxinawá Nova Olinda Indigenous Land, we investigate how participants manage challenges to safeguard knowledge diversity and usability during policy assessment and planning. Our findings show how, despite the use of participatory approaches, knowledge diversity ended up being compromised because policy practitioners were insufficiently attentive to power asymmetries and their implications. This, however, did not negatively affect the usability of the knowledge outcomes. Rather than focusing on the perfection of participatory methods, we call for a practical ethics that relies on culturally and ethically sensitive dialogues and that include continuous reflection. Such reflection will enable adaptation and improvisation to be able to respond to emerging power dynamics in an adequate and timely manner, ... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Acre; Amazonia Occidental; Amazônia Ocidental; Conhecimento tradicional; Feijó (AC); Gestão participativa; Método participativo; Participative management; Povos indígenas; Pueblos indigenas; REDD+; Servicios ecosistémicos; Serviços ecossistêmicos; SISA; Terra Indígena Kaxinawá de Nova Olinda (TIKNO); Western Amazon. |
|
Thesagro: |
Planejamento Participativo. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Ecosystem services; Environmental policy; Indigenous knowledge; Indigenous peoples. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/213936/1/27006.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03069naa a2200457 a 4500
001 2123244
005 2021-06-28
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1462-9011
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.04.018$2DOI
100 1 $aMATUK, F. A.
245 $aAllying knowledge integration and co-production for knowledge legitimacy and usability$bThe Amazonian SISA policy and the Kaxinawá Indigenous people case.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
520 $aEnvironmental policies that aim to enhance nature conservation, biodiversity, and well-being of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLC) rely on knowledge integration and co-production processes that include both science and Indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) systems. While these processes are expected to safeguard the diversity of knowledge systems, uneven power relations among participants often prevent them from achieving this which can affect the legitimacy and usability of the outcomes of these processes. Using a case study in the Acre state (Brazil), where policy practitioners implemented the REDD+policy System of Incentives for Ecosystem Services in the Brazilian Kaxinawá Nova Olinda Indigenous Land, we investigate how participants manage challenges to safeguard knowledge diversity and usability during policy assessment and planning. Our findings show how, despite the use of participatory approaches, knowledge diversity ended up being compromised because policy practitioners were insufficiently attentive to power asymmetries and their implications. This, however, did not negatively affect the usability of the knowledge outcomes. Rather than focusing on the perfection of participatory methods, we call for a practical ethics that relies on culturally and ethically sensitive dialogues and that include continuous reflection. Such reflection will enable adaptation and improvisation to be able to respond to emerging power dynamics in an adequate and timely manner, thereby ensuring both the legitimacy and the usability of the outcomes of knowledge integration and co-production.
650 $aEcosystem services
650 $aEnvironmental policy
650 $aIndigenous knowledge
650 $aIndigenous peoples
650 $aPlanejamento Participativo
653 $aAcre
653 $aAmazonia Occidental
653 $aAmazônia Ocidental
653 $aConhecimento tradicional
653 $aFeijó (AC)
653 $aGestão participativa
653 $aMétodo participativo
653 $aParticipative management
653 $aPovos indígenas
653 $aPueblos indigenas
653 $aREDD+
653 $aServicios ecosistémicos
653 $aServiços ecossistêmicos
653 $aSISA
653 $aTerra Indígena Kaxinawá de Nova Olinda (TIKNO)
653 $aWestern Amazon
700 1 $aTURNHOUT, E.
700 1 $aFLESKENS, L.
700 1 $aAMARAL, E. F. do
700 1 $aHAVERROTH, M.
700 1 $aBEHAGEL, J. H.
773 $tEnvironmental Science and Policy$gv. 112, p. 1-9, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Acre (CPAF-AC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
